Showing 1 - 10 of 11
This article proposes different tests for treatment effect heterogeneity when the outcome of interest, typically a duration variable, may be right-censored. The proposed tests study whether a policy 1) has zero distributional (average) effect for all subpopulations defined by covariate values,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014123930
One of the perceived advantages of difference-in-differences (DiD) methods is that they do not explicitly restrict how units select into treatment. However, when justifying DiD, researchers often argue that the treatment is “quasi-randomly” assigned. We investigate what selection mechanisms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014077196
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012303538
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012587986
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013275434
In this article, we consider identification, estimation, and inference procedures for treatment effect parameters using Difference-in-Differences (DID) with (i) multiple time periods, (ii) variation in treatment timing, and (iii) when the ``parallel trends assumption" holds potentially only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014033746
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011705946
In a unified framework, we provide estimators and confidence bands for a variety of treatment effects when the outcome of interest, typically a duration, is subjected to right censoring. Our methodology accommodates average, distributional, and quantile treatment effects under different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012996344
This article proposes new model checks for dynamic count models. Both portmanteau and omnibus-type tests for lack of residual autocorrelation are considered. The resulting test statistics are asymptotically pivotal when innovations are uncorrelated but possibly exhibit higher order serial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012996348
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009309754