Showing 1 - 10 of 5,916
This research examined whether people can accurately predict the risk preferences of others.Three experiments featuring different designs revealed a systematic bias: that participants predicted others to be more risk seeking than themselves in risky choices, regardless of whether the choices...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026773
This research explores whether there are systematic cross-national differences in choice-inferred risk preferences between Americans and Chinese. Study 1 found(a) that the Chinese were signi®cantly more risk seeking than the Americans, yet(b) that both nationals predicted exactly the opposite...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026775
Virtually all current theories of choice under risk or uncertainty are cognitive and consequentialist. They assume that people assess the desirability and likelihood of possible outcomes of choice alternatives and integrate this information through some type of expectation-based calculus to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026780
A medium - for example, points or money - is a token people receive as the immediate reward of their effort.It has no value in and of itself, but it can be traded for a desired outcome. Experiments demonstrate that, when people are faced with options entailing different outcomes, the presence of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026782
Most behavioral decision studies are about internal inconsistencies of decisions - that decisions (choices or judgments) made in one condition are different from decisions made in an apparently different but normatively equivalent condition. The present article reviews behavioral decision...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026783
This research identifies a new source of failure to make accurate affective predictions or to make experientially optimal choices. When people make predictions or choices, they are often in the joint evaluation (JE) mode; when people actually experience an event, they are often in the single...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026785
This research investigates an understudied decision heuristic, the majority rule. By using the rule, decision makers choose the option superior on most of the available cues. Cues are broadly defined, including advisors and attributes. We propose that decision makers are more likely to use the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026786
Recent years have witnessed a growing interest among psychologists and other social scientists in subjective wellbeing and happiness. Here we review selected contributions to this development from the literature on behavioral decision theory. In particular, we examine many, somewhat surprising,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026787
The purpose of this chapter is to discuss how regulatory focus theory, a theory of motivation and self-regulation, can be drawn upon to explain a variety of consumer decision making phenomena. We briefly review the major tenets of the theory, which proposes a fundamental distinction between two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014029073
Normative analyses of household financial decisions typically assume parameters of the household utility function. Some general issues on parameter assumptions for normative analysis are discussed in this study. We review selected normative household analyses appearing in finance and economics...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013097856