Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001711999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010192008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001529842
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001749882
In this paper, we use the axioms introduced in Eisenberg and Noe (2001) and Rogers and Veraart (2013) and study their consequences in terms of optimal sets of defaulting firms. We show that, from this point of view, the Absolute Priority axiom is not independent. We also show that the optimal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012999668
When it examines the risk of coordinated effects, an antitrust authority will usually compare the situation where the merger is accepted with an attendant risk of collusion with the benchmark case in which competition is present ex-post. The main objective of this paper is to show that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014050382
In this paper, we study the impact of a merger on collusion depending on the endowment of capital asset among firms. We show that the merger makes the collusion easier to sustain when asymmetric capital stock combines with less efficient insiders because of more symmetric conditions and closer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217749
Horizontal mergers are usually under the scrutiny of antitrust authorities due to their potential undesirable effects on prices and consumer surplus. Ex-post evidence, however, suggests that not always these effects take place and even relevant mergers may end up having negligible price effects....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013103770
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014438881
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009490103