Showing 1 - 10 of 48
I examine a class of utility maximization problems with a not necessarily lawinvariant utility, and with a not necessarily law-invariant risk measure constraint. The objective function is an integral of some function U with respect to some probability measure P, and the constraint set contains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009632290
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010515937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011990429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011857970
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012133513
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012058906
Arrow's classical result on the optimality of the deductible indemnity schedule holds in a situation where the insurer is a risk-neutral Expected-Utility (EU) maximizer, the insured is a risk-averse EU-maximizer, and the two parties share the same probabilistic beliefs about the realizations of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012972037
In the classical Expected-Utility framework, a problem of optimal insurance design with a premium constraint is equivalent to a problem of optimal insurance design with a minimum expected retention constraint. When the insurer has ambiguous beliefs represented by a non-additive probability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012972211
We consider a problem of the Neyman-Pearson type arising in the theory of portfolio choice in the presence of probability weighting, such as in markets with Choquet pricing (as in Araujo et al (2011), Cerreia-Vioglio et al (2015), Chateauneuf and Cornet (2015), or Chateauneuf et al (1996)) and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950266
I examine a class of utility maximization problems with a not necessarily law-invariant utility, and with a not necessarily law-invariant risk measure constraint. The objective function is a Lebesgue integral of some function U with respect to some probability measure P, and the constraint set...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013036699