Showing 1 - 10 of 31
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002490793
Influential economic approaches as random utility models assume a monotonic relation between choice frequencies and "strength of preference," in line with widespread evidence from the cognitive sciences, which also document an inverse relation to response times. However, for economic decisions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013040909
Approval voting allows voters to support as many candidates as they wish. One advantage of the method is that voters have weak or no incentives to vote insincerely. However, the exact meaning of this statement depends on how the voters' preferences over candidates are extended to sets. We show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909606
We investigate the implications of Salience Theory for the classical preference reversal phenomenon, where monetary valuations contradict risky choices. It has been stated that one factor behind reversals is that monetary valuations of lotteries are inflated when elicited in isolation, and that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013225624
Preferences over risky alternatives can be elicited by different methods, including direct pairwise choices and willingness-to-accept valuations. The results are frequently at odds, casting doubts on the foundations of economics. We develop a stochastic choice model predicting when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013242340
Transitivity is perhaps the most fundamental choice axiom and, therefore, almost all economic models assume that preferences are transitive. The empirical literature has regularly documented violations of transitivity, but these violations pose little problem as long as they are simply a result...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013489445
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013263518
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002180524
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011407568
Approval voting allows voters to support as many candidates as they wish. One advantage of the method is that voters have weak or no incentives to vote insincerely. However, the exact meaning of this statement depends on how the voters' preferences over candidates are extended to sets. We show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011926017