Similar Search Results

Social framing effects in leadership : preferences or beliefs?

Cartwright, Edward; Drouvelis, Michalis - 2020

We experimentally study the impact of framing effects in a repeated sequential social dilemma game. Our between-subjects design consists of two group level ("Wall Street" vs. "Community") and two individual level ("First (Second) Movers" vs. "Leaders (Followers)") frames. We find that average...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012294775

Does Telling White Lies Signal Pro-Social Preferences?

Biziou-van-Pol, Laura; Haenen, Jana; Novaro, Arianna; … - 2015

? To answer this question, we conducted a two-stage 2x2 experiment. In the first stage, we used a Deception Game to measure …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014135119

Between-group conflict and other-regarding preferences in nested social dilemmas

Böhm, Robert; Bornstein, Gary; Köppel, Hannes - 2014

conflicts. A first experiment shows that a between-group conflict leads to within-group cooperation and particularly individuals … second experiment reveals that prosocials' contributions to the group-specific or collective good vary as a function of the …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010337030

Framing and free riding : emotional responses and punishment in social dilemma games

Cubitt, Robin P. (contributor); … - 2008

; and, as a behavioural indicator of disapproval, punishment. Our findings are that, for a given pattern of contributions …, neither punishment nor emotion depends on the Give versus Take framing that we manipulate. To this extent, they suggest that … the social preferences we observe are robust to framing effects. -- framing effects ; punishment ; emotions ; public goods …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003675323

Evolution of "pay-it-forward" in the presence of the temptation to free-ride

Uchida, Satoshi; Sasaki, Tatsuya; Yamamoto, Hitoshi; … - In: Games 15 (2024) 3, pp. 1-15

Paying it forward" is a behavior in which people help someone else because they were helped in the past. Although experimental evidence exists that indicates that real human beings often "pay-it-forward" even in the face of free-rider risks, the theoretical basis for the evolution of this...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014636252

Preferences over punishment and reward mechanisms in social dilemmas

Kocher, Martin; Matzat, Dominik - In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics : JITE 172 (2016) 1, pp. 163-194

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011643344

Preferences over punishment and reward mechanisms in social dilemmas: comment

Spitzer, Matthew Laurence - In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics : JITE 172 (2016) 1, pp. 195-199

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011643362

Explaining Behavior in Public Goods Games : How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Murphy, Ryan O.; Ackermann, Kurt A. - 2013

There is a large body of evidence showing that a substantial proportion of people contribute positive amounts in public goods games, even if the situation is one-shot and completely anonymous. Clearly, this is in conflict with the prediction of neoclassic economic theory. One of the most...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014159187

Inequity Aversion Preferences in the Dynamic Public Goods Game

HU, Wei - 2015

This paper studies the impact of inequity aversion preferences (Fehr and Schmidt, 1999) in a "repeated" public goods game. We assume that agents care about the expected payoff differences among themselves over all periods of a game, so that it is in fact a dynamic game that is being played. In...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013020103

Flip a coin or vote : an experiment on choosing group decision

Hoffmann, Timo; Renes, Sander - 2016

paper we present the results of an experiment on the influence of private payoff information and the role of the available …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011570166