Showing 1 - 10 of 1,959
The question of whether lawyers and managers behave selfishly or fairly has inspired discussion for a long time. Empirical evidence, however, is sparse. Using data from an experiment with 359 law and business administration students, we investigate this question empirically and provide first...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011299882
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012651510
In this chapter, we discuss the “lab-in-the-field” methodology, which combines elements of both lab and field experiments in using standardized, validated paradigms from the lab in targeting relevant populations in naturalistic settings. We begin by examining how the methodology has been...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014023427
Departures from "economic man" behavior in many games in which fairness is a salient characteristic are now well …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014185562
We investigate the role of intentions in two-player two-stage games. For this purpose we systematically vary the set of opportunity sets the first mover can chose from and study how the second mover reacts not only to opportunities of gains but also of losses created by the choice of the first...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011480554
Cognitive dissonance is one of the most influential theories in psychology, and its oldest experiential realization is choice-induced dissonance. In contrast to the economic approach of assuming a person's choices reveal their preferences, psychologists have claimed since 1956 that people alter...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014047387
We investigate whether violations of canonical axioms of choice under risk are mistakes or a manifestation of true preferences. First, we elicit axiom and gamble preferences and then allow subjects to revise their potentially conflicting preferences. Among the behavioral patterns that allow for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014578322
We investigate whether violations of canonical axioms of choice under risk are mistakes or a manifestation of true preferences. First, we elicit axiom and gamble preferences and then allow subjects to revise their potentially conflicting preferences. Among the behavioral patterns that allow for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014556632
favoritism, merit-based fairness ideals, and self-favoring behavior in dictator games. We then show that these patterns also …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014578386
favoritism, merit-based fairness ideals, and self-favoring behavior in dictator games. We then show that these patterns also …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014576953