Showing 1 - 10 of 4,210
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012244800
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480317
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010237373
In a multiperiod investment framework, firms with high expected growth earn higher expected returns than firms with low expected growth, holding investment and expected profitability constant. This paper forms cross-sectional growth forecasts, and constructs an expected growth factor that yields...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011969143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011888412
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012861212
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129549
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012120359
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012002018
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011574925