This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than...

This paper proposes a new panel unit root test based on Simes' [Biometrika 1986, An Improved Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significanceʺ] classical intersection test. The test is robust to general patterns of cross-sectional dependence and yet straightforward to implement, only...

Time series cointegration tests, even in the presence of large sample sizes, often yield conflicting conclusions ("mixed signalsʺ) as measured by, inter alia, a low correlation of empirical p-values [see Gregory et al., 2004, Journal of Applied Econometrics]. Using their methodology, we present...

Meta-analytic panel unit root tests such as Fisher's X 2 test, which consist of pooling the p-values of time series unit root tests, are widely applied in practice. Recently, several Monte Carlo studies have found these tests’ Error-in-Rejection Probabilities (or, synonymously, size...

We derive the null distribution of the nonlinear unit root test proposed in Kapetanios et al. [Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., Snell, A., 2003. Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics 112, 359–379] when nonzero means or both means and deterministic trends...

Volatility break robust panel unit root tests (PURTs) recently proposed by Herwartz and Siedenburg (Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2008, 53, 137-150) and Demetrescu and Hanck (Econometrics Letters 2012, 117, 10-13) have different performances under both the null and local alternatives....