Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001527096
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001593029
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001631744
Empirical tests of reduced form models of default attribute a large fraction of observed credit spreads to compensation for jump-to-default risk. However, these models preclude a “contagion-risk” channel, where the aggregate corporate bond index reacts adversely to a credit event. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013133964
Empirical tests of reduced form models of default attribute a large fraction of observed credit spreads to compensation for jump-to-default risk. However, these models preclude a "contagion-risk'' channel, where the aggregate corporate bond index reacts adversely to a credit event. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013148003
Reduced-form models of default that attribute a large fraction of credit spreads to compensation for credit event risk typically preclude the most plausible economic justification for such risk to be priced--namely, a "contagious" response of the market portfolio during the credit event. When...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009657657
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003885699
"Empirical tests of reduced form models of default attribute a large fraction of observed credit spreads to compensation for jump-to-default risk. However, these models preclude a "contagion-risk'' channel, where the aggregate corporate bond index reacts adversely to a credit event. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003938437
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011401287
Structural models of default calibrated to historical default rates, recovery rates, and Sharpe ratios typically generate Baa-Aaa credit spreads that are significantly below historical values. However, this “credit spread puzzle” can be resolved if one accounts for the fact that default...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013134386