Showing 1 - 10 of 25
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950838
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015155956
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012006070
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012870146
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012854232
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012118108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014227821
By using a bunching design on rich administrative tax records from Uruguay's tax agency we explore how individual taxpayers respond to personal income taxation in a context with high sheltering opportunities. We estimate a moderated elasticity of taxable income in the first kink point (0.16)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012001357
Based on detailed administrative tax records, we implement a bunching design to explorehow individual taxpayers respond to personal income taxation in Uruguay. We estimatea very modest elasticity of taxable income at the first kink point (0.06) driven bya combination of gross labour income and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849655
By using a bunching design on rich administrative tax records from Uruguay's tax agency we explore how individual taxpayers respond to personal income taxation in a context with high sheltering opportunities. We estimate a moderated elasticity of taxable income in the first kink point (0.16)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012870196