Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Experimental research on decision making under risk has until now always employed choice data in order to evaluate the empirical performance of expected utility and the alternative nonexpected utility theories. The present paper performs a similar analysis which relies on pricing data instead of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010296261
This paper investigates distributive justice using a fourfold experimental design : The ignorance and the risk scenarios are combined with the self-concern and the umpire modes. We study behavioral switches between self-concern and umpire mode and investigate the goodness of ten standards of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010296310
Using an experiment with material incentives, this paper investigates the violation of composite dominance relationships, viz. absolute Pareto dominance, Pareto rank dominance, transfer dominance, Lorenz dominance, and generalized Lorenz dominance. Moreover, we test tail independence. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010296311
Experimental research on decision making under risk has until now always employed choice data in order to evaluate the empirical performance of expected utility and the alternative nonexpected utility theories. The present paper performs a similar analysis which relies on pricing data instead of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010278003
Experiments on choice under risk typically involve multiple decisions by individual subjects. The choice of mechanism for selecting decision(s) for payoff is an essential design feature that is often driven by appeal to the isolation hypothesis or the independence axiom. We report two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010285720
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001760275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001760277
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001804352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001781985
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003010904