Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002081838
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002352051
"This book examines the different conceptions of the individual that have emerged in recent new approaches in economics, including behavioral economics, experimental economics, social preferences approaches, game theory, neuroeconomics, evolutionary and complexity economics, and the capability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008648399
This paper develops a conception of personal identity for Amartya Sen's capability framework that emphasizes his self-scrutinizing aspect of the self and related concept of commitment, and compares this conception to the co1lective intentionality-based one advanced in Davis (2003c). The paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325342
This paper examines economists’ indefensible attachment to the positive-normative distinction, and suggests a behavioral economics explanation of their behavior on the subject. It reviews the origins of the distinction in Hume’s guillotine and logical positivism, and shows how they form the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014160104
Economics imperialism is broadly explained as economics having an impact on other disciplines. But how should economics imperialism be understood when it is in some sense the product of other disciplines having an impact on economics? The paper examines psychology’s impact on economics in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014165257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009529299
This paper reviews the debate in economics over neuroeconomics' contribution to economics. It distinguishes majority and minority views, argues that this debate has been framed by mainstream economics' conception of itself as an isolated science, and argues that this framing has put off the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012993779
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013418927
This paper examines behavioral economics' use of the positive-normative distinction in its critique of standard rational choice theory as normative, and argues that it departs from Robbins' understanding of that distinction in ways that suggest behavioral economists themselves do not observe...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012945772