Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011990429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015431877
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009305377
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011379005
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011573392
In the classical expected utility framework, a problem of optimal insurance design with a premium constraint is equivalent to a problem of optimal insurance design with a minimum expected retention constraint. When the insurer has ambiguous beliefs represented by a non-additive probability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011443689
In Arrow's (1971) classical problem of optimal insurance design, a linear deductible schedule is optimal for an Expected-Utility (EU) maximizing decision maker (DM), if the premium depends on the indemnity's actuarial value, if the DM and the insurer share the same probabilistic beliefs about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901413
We re-examine the problem of budget-constrained demand for insurance indemnification when the insured and the insurer disagree about the likelihoods associated with the realizations of the insurable loss. For ease of comparison with the classical literature, we adopt the original setting of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012898511
Empirical evidence suggests that ambiguity is prevalent in insurance pricing and underwriting, and that often insurers tend to exhibit more ambiguity than the insured individuals (e.g., Hogarth and Kunreuther (1989)). Motivated by these findings, we consider a problem of demand for insurance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013029423
We examine a problem of demand for insurance indemnification, when the insured is sensitive to ambiguity and behaves according to the Maxmin-Expected Utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989), whereas the insurer is a (risk-averse or risk-neutral) Expected-Utility maximizer. We characterize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013405416