Showing 1 - 10 of 17
We revisit Maxwell's (1998) analysis to show that MQS regulation has no effects on the high-quality firm's incentive to adopt a more efficient technology in a vertically differentiated duopoly with fixed costs of quality improvement and full market coverage
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014224173
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008662301
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009623262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009665975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010187695
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003477002
We study the optimal contract choice of an upstream monopolist producing an essential input that may sell to two vertically differentiated downstream firms. The upstream supplier can offer an exclusive contract to one of the firms or non-exclusive contracts to both firms. Each of the latter can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011703396
In this paper we show that, in the presence of buyer and seller power, a monopolist can enter into a costly contractual relationship with a low-quality supplier with the sole intention of improving its bargaining position relative to a high-quality supplier, without ever selling the good...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011730400
Double marginalization causes inefficiencies in vertical markets. This paper argues that such inefficiencies may be beneficial to final consumers in markets producing vertically differentiated goods. The rationale behind this result is that enhancing efficiency in high-quality supply chains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011734182
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011346104