Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Entry deterrence can occur when downstream incumbents hold non-controlling ownership shares of a supplier which is commited to charge uniform prices to all downstream firms. The ownership shares imply a rebate on the input price for the incumbents through the profit participation. Such backward...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011649373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012586715
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009786662
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012875965
We analyze the effects of downstream firms’ acquisition of pure cash flow rights in an efficient upstream supplier when all firms compete in prices. With an acquisition, downstream firms internalize the effects of their actions on their rivals’ sales. Double marginalization is enhanced....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009512802
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009526551
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011665421
We show that competing downstream firms may rather invest in their inefficient inhouse production than help improve the technology of the efficient supplier, even if this is costless. Even worse, a downstream firm can have strong incentives to decrease the efficiency of the supplier in order to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011788218
In a market with two exclusive manufacturer-retailer pairs, we show that colluding manufacturers may not be able to attain supra-competitive profits when contracts with retailers are secret. The stability of manufacturer collusion depends on the retailers' beliefs. We consider various dynamic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012697477
We review the Chicago school's single monopoly profit theory whereby an upstream monopolist cannot increase its profits through vertical integration as it has sufficient market power anyways. In our model the dominant supplier has full bargaining power and uses observable two-part tariffs. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012704705