Showing 1 - 10 of 46
It is well known that being the proposer or agenda setter is advantagenous in many collective decision making situations. In the canonical model of distributive bargaining (Baron and Ferejon, 1989), proposers are certain of being part of the coalition that forms, and, conditional on being in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014081559
This paper examines the relationship between voting weights and expected equilibrium payoffs in legislative bargaining and provides a necessary and sufficient condition for payoffs to be proportional to weights. This condition has a natural interpretation in terms of the supply and demand for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012997650
It is well-known that proposers have an advantage in the canonical model of bargaining in legislatures: proposers are sure of being part of the coalition that forms, and, conditional on being in a coalition, a player receives more as a proposer than as a coalition partner. In this paper I show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013135800
We study how inefficiencies of market failure may be further amplified by political choices made by interest groups created in the inefficient market. We take an occupational choice framework, where agents are endowed heterogeneously with wealth and talent. In our model, market failure due to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013119975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014429113
Much literature on political behavior treats politicians as motivated by reelection, choosing actions to signal their types to voters. We identify two novel implications of models in which signalling incentives are important. First, because incumbents only care about clearing a reelection...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013110929
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009238646
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009310051
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009506566
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010197102