Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003820037
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011922233
This paper shows how political parties differentiate to reduce electoral competition. Two parties choose platforms in a unidimensional policy space, and then candidates from these parties compete for votes in a continuum of constituencies with different median voters. Departing from their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011702605
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011584014
Although most of the political-economy literature blames inefficient policies on institutions or politicians' motives to supply bad policy, voters may themselves be partially responsible by demanding bad policy. In this paper, we posit that voters may systematically err when assessing potential...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012455764
Although most of the political-economy literature blames inefficient policies on institutions or politicians' motives to supply bad policy, voters may themselves be partially responsible by demanding bad policy. In this paper, we posit that voters may systematically err when assessing potential...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012977628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003505554
This paper discusses the implications of strategic voting for institutional design in environments where the only role of elections is to aggregate information. We adopt a mechanism design perspective, which assumes that prior to a standard voting game, a fictitious designer has to select the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014060365
This paper develops a rational theory of momentum in elections with sequential voting. We analyze a two-candidate election in which some voters are uncertain about the realization of a state variable that can affect their preferences between the candidates. Voters receive private signals about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012733628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012109384