Showing 1 - 10 of 13
We analyze a three-player legislative bargaining game in which legislators privately informed about their preferences bargain over an ideological and a distributive decision. Communication takes place before a proposal is offered and majority rule voting determines the outcome. When ideological...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013124087
Prior research on quot;strategic votingquot; has reached the conclusion that unanimity rule is uniquely bad: it results in destruction of information, and hence makes voters worse off. We show that this conclusion depends critically on the assumption that the issue being voted on is exogenous,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012731002
We study optimal policy experimentation by a committee. We consider a dynamic bargaining game in which committee members choose either a risky reform or a safe alternative each period. When no redistribution is allowed the unique equilibrium outcome is generically inefficient. When...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012911102
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011916055
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011889807
We study conditions under which optimal policy experimentation can be implemented by a committee. We consider a dynamic bargaining game in which committee members choose to implement either a risky reform or a safe alternative with known returns each period. We find that when no redistribution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011897251
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012655806
In this paper we analyze a legislative bargaining game in which parties privately informed about their preferences bargain over an ideological and a distributive decision. Communication takes place before a proposal is offered and majority rule voting determines the outcome. When the private...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008665138
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010238588
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010386044