Showing 1 - 10 of 56
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000914304
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001364656
We assume that a voter’s judgment about a proposal depends on (i) the proposal’s probability of being right (or good or just) and (ii) the voter’s probability of making a correct judgment about its rightness (or wrongness). Initially, the state of a proposal (right or wrong), and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014042385
We propose a new voting system, satisfaction approval voting (SAV), for multiwinner elections, in which voters can approve of as many candidates or as many parties as they like. However, the winners are not those who receive the most votes, as under approval voting (AV), but those who maximize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014045262
In U.S. presidential elections, voters in noncompetitive states seem not to count — and so have zero voting power, according to the Banzhaf and other voting-power indices — because they cannot influence the outcome in their states. But because the electoral votes of these states are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014144928
We propose a new voting system, satisfaction approval voting (SAV), for multiwinner elections, in which voters can approve of as many candidates or as many parties as they like. However, the winners are not those who receive the most votes, as under approval voting (AV), but those who maximize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013140591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000958562
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003562490
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011777705
We extend approval voting so as to elect multiple candidates, who may be either individuals or members of a political party, in rough proportion to their approval in the electorate. We analyze two divisor methods of apportionment, first proposed by Jefferson and Webster, that iteratively...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012960207