Showing 1 - 10 of 49
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009243145
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009784694
Almost all WTO dispute panels exceed their statutory time limits. This is often seen to indicate a more general problem for panels to manage their tasks. The time required varies considerably across panels however, suggesting that they do not face the same problems. To shed light on these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010206892
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003284845
This paper examines the role of the burden of proof (BoP) in National Treatment (NT) disputes under trade agreements. In the situation under study, imports may cause environmental damage, in which case less favorable treatment of imported products may be globally desirable from an international...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003809130
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003857056
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001587002
It has been alleged since its inception that the WTO Dispute Settlement (DS) mechanism is biased against developing countries, as manifested in e.g. allegedly too low rates of dispute initiation. To shed light on this issue, this study analyses the determinants of developing country...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014199191
The paper argues that focusing only on disputes <I>formally raised</I> in the WTO Dispute Settlement system underestimates the extent of trade conflict resolution within the WTO. Both the SPS and TBT Committees address a significant number of ‘specific trade concerns' (STCs) that in the overwhelming...</i>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049353
Almost all WTO dispute panels exceed their statutory time limits. This is often seen to indicate a more general problem for panels to manage their tasks. The time required varies considerably across panels however, suggesting that they do not face the same problems. To shed light on these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049355