Showing 1 - 10 of 29
Firms have not historically called their convertible bonds as soon as they could force conversion. Various explanations for the delay rely on the size of the dividends that bondholders forgo so long as they do not convert. We investigate an important change in convertible security design, namely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010326309
This online appendix belongs to the paper "Disappearing Call Delay and Dividend-Protected Convertible Bonds" and provides a further investigation of explanators of call delay. Internet Appendix I sets out a dividend-related signaling model that can explain a delay in calling...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013026251
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010243498
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010247692
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009722624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011968761
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011561895
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009630176
Firms have not historically called their convertible bonds as soon as conversion could be forced. A number of explanations for the delay rely on the size of the dividends that bondholders forgo so long as they do not convert. We investigate an important change in convertible security design,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013037149
We provide evidence that security design reflects the interplay of capital supplier and security issuer preferences. While call provisions have historically been the default option in convertible security design, only a minority of post-2005 issues are callable. Because hedge funds dominate the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012969959