Showing 1 - 7 of 7
This short comment argues that both cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) should be seen as imperfect tools for evaluating health policy. This is true, not only for extra-welfarists, but even for welfarists, since both CBA and CEA can deviate from the use of social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014197762
We introduce a new "different lives" survey format, which asks respondents to rank hypothetical lives described in terms of longevity, health, happiness, income, and other elements of the quality of life. In this short paper, we show that the format is of policy relevance whether a mental state,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014219373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009578156
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010468700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012627503
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012183508
We examine how different welfarist frameworks evaluate the social value of mortality risk-reduction. These frameworks include classical, distributively unweighted cost-benefit analysis — i.e., the “value per statistical life” (VSL) approach — and three benchmark social welfare functions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014170939