Showing 1 - 10 of 25
We analyze the efficiency defense in merger control. First, we show that the relationship between exogenous efficiency gains and social welfare can be non-monotone. Second, we consider both endogenous mergers and endogenous efficiencies and find that merger proposals are largely aligned with a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010309799
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001453273
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001759946
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001804395
This paper argues that - in contrast to an often expressed view - the formation of larger and more powerful buyers need not reduce welfare by stifling suppliers' incentives. If contracts are determined in bilateral negotiations, the presence of larger buyers may both increase suppliers'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002556787
We analyze duopoly Bertrand competition under network effects. We consider both incompatible and compatible products. Our main result is that network effects create a fundamental conflict between the maximization of social welfare and consumer surplus whenever products are incompatible. While...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217962
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014365234
We analyze oligopolistic third-degree price discrimination relative to uniform pricing when markets are always covered. Pricing equilibria are critically determined by supply-side features such as the number of firms and their marginal cost differences. It follows that each firm's Lerner index...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013326514
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009507148
Katz (1987), DeGraba (1990), and Yoshida (2000) have formulated theories that price discrimination bans in intermediary goods markets tend to have positive effects on allocative, dynamic and productive efficiency, respectively. We show that none of these results is robust vis-à-vis endogenous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009757897