Showing 1 - 10 of 16
This paper examines why unsolicited ratings tend to be lower than solicited ratings. Both self-selection among issuers and strategic conservatism of rating agencies may be reasonable explanations. Analyses of default incidences of non-U.S. borrowers between January 1996 and December 2006 show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003904071
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003989549
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003707695
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008659834
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003848089
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001813471
We provide insights into determinants of the rating level of 371 issuers which defaulted in the years 1999 to 2003, and into the leader-follower relationship between Moody's and S&P. The evidence for the rating level suggests that Moody's assigns lower ratings than S&P for all observed periods...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002844152
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009010624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003674892
We consider 1927 borrowers from 54 countries who had a credit rating by both Moody s and S&P as of the end of 1998, and their subsequent default history up to the end of 2002. Viewing bond ratings as predicted probabilities of default, we show that it is unlikely that both agencies are well...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010509832