Showing 1 - 5 of 5
In an excellent article from a recent issue of this journal, Sellar, Stoll and Chavas (1985) make a technical error which causes them to misstate their closed-ended estimates of willingness to pay. Truncation of the estimated cummulative distribution function must we made explicit in compution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009644160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013473288
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013188010
This article presents an empirical approach to correcting for spatial interactions in stated preference data when valuing large-scale, spatially variable environmental improvements. This approach is presented in the context of a contingent valuation study estimating the benefits of reduced...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005522216
We compare two approaches to mitigating hypothetical bias. The study design includes three treatments: an actual payment treatment, a contingent valuation (CV) treatment with a follow-up certainty question, and a CV treatment with a cheap talk script. Our results suggest that both the follow-up...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008508645