Showing 1 - 10 of 58
We compare expected shortfall and value-at-risk (VaR) in terms of consistency with expected utility maximization and elimination of tail risk. We use the concept of stochastic dominance in studying these two aspects of risk measures. We conclude that expected shortfall is more applicable than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004971242
We compare expected shortfall with value-at-risk (VaR) in three aspects: estimation errors, decomposition into risk factors, and optimization. We describe the advantages and the disadvantages of expected shortfall over VaR. We show that expected shortfall is easily decomposed and optimized while...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004971261
Value-at-risk (VaR) has become a standard measure used in financial risk management due to its conceptual simplicity, computational facility, and ready applicability. However, many authors claim that VaR has several conceptual problems. Artzner et al. (1997, 1999), for example, have cited the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004978210
In this paper, we compare value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall under market stress. Assuming that the multivariate extreme value distribution represents asset returns under market stress, we simulate asset returns with this distribution. With these simulated asset returns, we examine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004978213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006721579
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005194904
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001598298
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001607851
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001564769
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005879001