Showing 1 - 10 of 652
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003774421
Research in intertemporal choice has been done in a variety of contexts, yet there is a remarkable consensus that future outcomes are discounted (or undervalued) relative to immediate outcomes. In this paper, we (a) review some of the key findings in the literature, (b) critically examine and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005547275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006096570
Preferences inferred from choice are more likely to favor the alternative that is superior with respect to the prominent (most important or salient) attribute than are preferences inferred from matching (direct tradeoff) judgments. This prominence effect violates standard models of rational...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009198176
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006650403
Why would consumers prefer live television, even when tape-delayed broadcasts provide the same sensory experience? We propose that indeterminacy is a key reason. Indeterminate consumption experiences (such as watching sports competitions live on television) unfold in ways that are not decided ex...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005614079
Common sense suggests that consumers make more satisfying decisions as they consider their options more closely. Yet we argue that such close consideration can have undesirable consequences because it may induce attachment to the options--a sense of prefactual ownership of the choice options....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005783267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001760190
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007223091
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001715824