Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005571348
There is much evidence that people willingly violate expected utility theory when making choices. Several axiomatic theories have been proposed to explain some of this evidence, but there are few data that discriminate between the theories. To gather such data, an experiment was conducted using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678196
We review 74 experiments with no, low, or high performance-based financial incentives. The modal result is no effect on mean performance (though variance is usually reduced by higher payment). Higher incentive does improve performance often, typically judgment tasks that are responsive so better...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678204
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005820653
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832402
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005708351
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005708424
Betweenness is a weakened form of the independence axiom, stating that a probability mixture of two gambles should lie between them in preference. Betweenness is used in many generalizations of expected utility and in applications to game theory and macroeconomics. Experimental violations of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005709630
Recent experimental choice studies compare expected utility with competing theories of decision-making under risk. Formal tests used to judge the theories usually count the number of consistent responses, ignoring systematic variation in inconsistent responses. A maximum-likelihood estimation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005699991
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005248592