Showing 1 - 10 of 224
In this reply to the comment by Gerlagh, we confirm an error in our estimate of the certainty-equivalent social cost of carbon (SCC) reported in Newbold et al. (2013), and we discuss the underlying conceptual difficulties that arise in conducting a social welfare analysis when preferences are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010894880
The "social cost of carbon" (SCC) is the present value of the stream of future damages from one additional unit of carbon emissions in a particular year. This paper develops a rapid assessment model for the SCC. The model includes the essential ingredients for calculating the SCC at the global...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010660890
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010482316
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010482321
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009736792
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010634449
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011305669
The “social cost of carbon” (SCC) is the present value of the future stream of damages from one additional ton of carbon emissions in a particular year. This paper develops a simple model for calculating the SCC and compares estimates of the SCC under certainty and uncertainty. Our model...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008642557
Since 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has used benefit-cost analysis to evaluate many of its surface water quality regulations. Early regulations were aimed at controlling conventional and toxic pollutants that were directly linked to highly visible water quality problems. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010544490
Since 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has used benefit-cost analysis to evaluate many of its surface water quality regulations. Early regulations were aimed at controlling conventional and toxic pollutants that were directly linked to highly visible water quality problems. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010567271