Showing 21 - 30 of 318
Despite considerable research, there is little consensus about the impact of Medicaid eligibility expansions for low-income children. In this paper, I reexamine the expansions' impact on Medicaid take-up and private insurance "crowd-out." Focusing on the most influential estimates of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013232024
Using data from the 1988-1996 Current Population Surveys (CPS), we re-examine the evidence presented in Yelowitz (1995) showing that expansions in Medicaid eligibility for children were associated with increased labor force participation and reduced participation in Aid to Families with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013233213
Panel surveys generally suffer from "seam bias"--too few transitions observed within reference periods and too many reported between interviews. Seam bias is likely to affect duration models severely since both the start date and the end date of a spell may be misreported. In this paper we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013158018
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001683283
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001542492
"The NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health provides summaries of publications like this. You can sign up to receive the NBER Bulletin on Aging and Health by email. Economists have devoted considerable resources to estimating local average treatment effects of expansions in Medicaid eligibility for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003982004
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003933537
We use a linear probability model with interactions and a switching probit model (SPM) to estimate heterogeneous effects of Medicaid expansions on Medicaid take-up, private insurance coverage and crowd-out. Specifically, we estimate: i) LATEs; ii) ATETs for the currently eligible; and iii) ATETs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009309692
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010199842
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010205341