Showing 241 - 250 of 618
We first propose procedures for estimating the rejection probabilities for bootstrap tests in Monte Carlo experiments without actually computing a bootstrap test for each replication. These procedures are only about twice as expensive as estimating rejection probabilities for asymptotic tersts....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688294
We study several tests for the coefficient of the single right-hand-side endogenous variable in a linear equation estimated by instrumental variables. We show that writing all the test statistics -- Student's t, Anderson-Rubin, the LM statistic of Kleibergen and Moreira (K), and likelihood ratio...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688347
Davidson and MacKinnon (1981) proposed a simple procedure for testing the specification of a non-linear regression model against the evidence provided by a non-nested alternative. We extend their results in several directions. First, we relax a number of assumptions of the previous paper: We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688369
Many specification tests can be computed by means of artificial linear regressions. These are linear regressions designed to be used as calculating devices to obtain test statistics and other quantities of interest. In this paper, we discuss the general principles which underlie all artificial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688372
We propose a wild bootstrap procedure for linear regression models estimated by instrumental variables. Like other bootstrap procedures that we have proposed elsewhere, it uses efficient estimates of the reduced-form equation(s). Unlike them, it takes account of possible heteroskedasticity of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688408
We develop a new method, based on the use of polar coordinates, to investigate the existence of moments for instrumental variables and related estimators in the linear regression model. For generalized IV estimators, we obtain familiar results. For JIVE, we obtain the new result that this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688414
We first propose two procedures for estimating the rejection probabilities of bootstrap tests in Monte Carlo experiments without actually computing a bootstrap test for each replication. These procedures are only about twice as expensive (per replication) as estimating rejection probabilities...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688436
We propose several Lagrange Multiplier tests of logit and probit models, which may be inexpensively computed by artificial linear regressions. These may be used to test for omitted variables and heteroskedasticity. We argue that one of these tests is likely to have better small-sample...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688472
The asymptotic power of a statistical test depends on the model being tested, the (implicit) alternative against which the test is constructed, and the process which actually generated the data. The exact way in which it does so is examined for several classes of models and tests. First, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688503
We introduce the concept of the bootstrap discrepancy, which measures the difference in rejection probabilities between a bootstrap test based on a given test statistic and that of a (usually infeasible) test based on the true distribution of the statistic. We show that the bootstrap discrepancy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005688539