Showing 231 - 240 of 278
We propose a procedure for dividing indivisible items between two players in which each player ranks the items from best to worst and has no information about the other player’s ranking. It ensures that each player receives a subset of items that it values more than the other player’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005616848
Three models are presented in which two players agree to share power in a particular ratio, but either player may subsequently “fire” at the other, as in a duel, to try to eliminate it. The players have positive probabilities of eliminating each other by firing. If neither is successful, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005619418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005826709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005826720
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005826752
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005826753
Democracy resolves conflicts in difficult games like Prisoners’ Dilemma and Chicken by stabilizing their cooperative outcomes. It does so by transforming these games into games in which voters are presented with a choice between a cooperative outcome and a Pareto-inferior noncooperative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005835685
We propose a new voting system, satisfaction approval voting (SAV), for multiwinner elections, in which voters can approve of as many candidates or as many parties as they like. However, the winners are not those who receive the most votes, as under approval voting (AV), but those who maximize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008506101
Assume that players strictly rank each other as coalition partners. We propose a procedure whereby they “fall back” on their preferences, yielding internally compatible, or coherent, majority coalition(s), which we call fallback coalitions. If there is more than one fallback coalition, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008506105
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005350999