Showing 261 - 270 of 278
We assume that a voter’s judgment about a proposal depends on (i) the proposal’s probability of being right (or good or just) and (ii) the voter’s probability of making a correct judgment about its rightness (or wrongness). Initially, the state of a proposal (right or wrong), and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014042385
We propose a new voting system, satisfaction approval voting (SAV), for multiwinner elections, in which voters can approve of as many candidates or as many parties as they like. However, the winners are not those who receive the most votes, as under approval voting (AV), but those who maximize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014045262
Power sharing is modeled as a duel over some prize. Each of two players may either share the prize in some ratio or fire at the other player - either in sequence or simultaneously - and eliminate it with a specified probability. If one player eliminates the other without being eliminated itself,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014048115
Three models are presented in which two players agree to share power in a particular ratio, but either player may subsequently "fire" at the other, as in a duel, to try to eliminate it. The players have positive probabilities of eliminating each other by firing. If neither is successful, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014048116
Democracy resolves conflicts in difficult games like Prisoners' Dilemma and Chicken by stabilizing their cooperative outcomes. It does so by transforming these games into games in which voters are presented with a choice between a cooperative outcome and a Pareto-inferior noncooperative outcome....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014211801
In U.S. presidential elections, voters in noncompetitive states seem not to count — and so have zero voting power, according to the Banzhaf and other voting-power indices — because they cannot influence the outcome in their states. But because the electoral votes of these states are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014144928
We present an exhaustive computational study of algorithms for two-person allocation of indivisible objects. We identify eight algorithms that generate balanced allocations using only players' ordinal rankings and test them over all possible rankings of up to N = 12 items. Algorithms are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952834
Assume that two players have strict rankings over an even number of indivisible items. We propose algorithms to find allocations of these items that are maximin — maximize the minimum rank of the items that the players receive — and are envy-free and Pareto-optimal if such allocations exist....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014025948
We propose a new voting system, satisfaction approval voting (SAV), for multiwinner elections, in which voters can approve of as many candidates or as many parties as they like. However, the winners are not those who receive the most votes, as under approval voting (AV), but those who maximize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013140591
Many procedures have been suggested for the venerable problem of dividing a set of indivisible items between two players. We propose a new algorithm (AL), related to one proposed by Brams and Taylor (BT), which requires only that the players strictly rank items from best to worst. Unlike BT, in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013081091