Showing 151 - 160 of 173
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014671617
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012536651
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012633182
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012088430
This paper examined the citation impact of Chinese- and English-language articles in Chinese-English bilingual journals indexed by Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). Two findings were obtained from comparative analysis: (1) Chinese-language articles were not biased in citations compared with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011115852
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011204912
Amine-functionalized sorbents prepared by wet impregnation method shows great promises for CO2 capture from real flue gas in power plants. The objective of this work is to understand CO2 adsorption thermodynamics and mechanisms at varied polyethylenimine (PEI) loadings on mesoporous MCM-41 by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011208366
Using panel data on Canadian industris and OECD countries, this article examines empirically the role of growth in domestic and external demand in labou productivity growth. The findings suggest that most of the post-2000 slowdown in business sector labour productivity growth was the result of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010739878
National statistics offices in different countries, as well as individual researchers, make a range of different assumptions and use different approaches to estimating multifactor productivity (MFP) growth. As a result, MFP growth estimates can vary for methodological reasons across countries...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010739879
This paper studies the correlations between peer review and citation indicators when evaluating research quality in library and information science (LIS). Forty-two LIS experts provided judgments on a 5-point scale of the quality of research published by 101 scholars; the median rankings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795323