Showing 1 - 10 of 620
In this paper we report results from a comparison of numerically calibrated game theoretic integrated assessment models that explore stability and performance of international coalitions for climate change mitigation. Specifically, by means of this ensemble of models we are able to identify...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010398436
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010900687
In this paper we report results from a comparison of numerically calibrated game theoretic integrated assessment models that explore stability and performance of international coalitions for climate change mitigation. Specifically, by means of this ensemble of models we are able to identify...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010747051
type="main" <p>We investigate how different designs of carbon offset mechanisms, like the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), affect the success of self-enforcing climate treaties. In a game-theoretic numerical model of coalition formation we find that participation in the agreement...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011147943
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011488250
In this paper we report results from a comparison of numerically calibrated game theoretic integrated assessment models that explore stability and performance of international coalitions for climate change mitigation. Specifically, by means of this ensemble of models we are able to identify...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014149489
In this paper we report results from a comparison of numerically calibrated game theoretic integrated assessment models that explore stability and performance of international coalitions for climate change mitigation. Specifically, by means of this ensemble of models we are able to identify...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010232324
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003532373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000968902
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000971110