Showing 1 - 10 of 928
We use an experiment to compare two institutions for allocating the proceeds of team production. Under revenue-sharing, each team member receives an equal share of team output; under leader-determined shares, a team leader has the power to implement her own allocation. Both arrangements are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005453707
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003375966
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003816053
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003179367
We use an experiment to compare two institutions for allocating the proceeds of team production. Under revenue-sharing, each team member receives an equal share of team output; under leader-determined shares, a team leader has the power to implement her own allocation. Both arrangements are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005127361
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008160556
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008879074
Many important decisions are taken according to weighted majority rule. Power indices predict that enlargement of the voting body may affect the balance of power between the original members even if their number of votes and the decision rule remain constant. Some of the existing voters may...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005453699
This paper presents theory and experiments to investigate how network architecture influences route-choice behavior by comparing outcomes across several different networks. The network changes we consider are based on abstract examples illustrating the Pigou-Knight-Downs and Braess Paradoxes. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005453714
We report an experiment comparing sequential and simultaneous contributions to a public good in a quasi-linear two-person setting (Varian, Journal of Public Economics, 1994). Our findings support the theoretical argument that sequential contributions result in lower overall provision than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005453723