Showing 1 - 10 of 4,185
We empirically study individual pension choice between two di.erent defined benefit (DB) plans and a defined contribution (DC) plan. The DB plans differ in their contribution rates and in the way retirement benefits are calculated, as a proportion of final salary or as a proportion of lifetime...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005112919
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009407882
We use a long panel with information on expected and realized changes in household finances to study the process of expectation formation and expectation errors, controlling for individual fixed effects. We find that, following improvements in financial situation, individuals tend to form...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849703
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012259669
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013279621
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013279764
This paper solves an empirically parameterised model of life-cycle consumption which extends the precautionary savings models of Carroll (1997), and Deaton (1991), to allow for uncollaterized borrowing and default. In case households choose to default: (i) their access to credit markets is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011071178
Using U.K. microeconomic data, we analyze the empirical determinants of voluntary annuity market demand. We find that annuity market participation increases with financial wealth, life expectancy and education and decreases with other pension income and a possible bequest motive for surviving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011071216
This paper solves an empirically parameterized model of households’ optimal demand for nominal and inflation indexed annuities. The model incorporates mortality, inflation, and real interest rate risk. The model draws some interesting predictions. First, the welfare calculations on the access...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010745194
We investigate whether a rare event (like the default of the annuity provider) can explain the annuity market participation puzzle. High risk aversion is needed to change behavior in the presence of such a disastrous shock but higher risk aversion also makes annuities more valuable. Therefore,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010745400