Showing 1 - 10 of 1,015
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010365057
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012614041
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012499073
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013459199
Which investment model best fits firm-level data? To answer this question we estimate alternative models using Compustat data. Surprisingly, the two best-performing specifications are based on Hayashi’s (1982) model. This model’s foremost implication, that Q is a sufficient statistic for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005489855
The best predictor of current investment at the firm level is lagged investment. This lagged-investment effect is empirically more important than the cash-flow and Q effects combined. We show that the specification of investment adjustment costs proposed by Christiano et al. (2005) predicts the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010868916
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011227977
Recurrent intervals of inattention to the stock market are optimal if consumers incur a utility cost to observe asset values. When consumers observe the value of their wealth, they decide whether to transfer funds between a transactions account from which consumption must be financed and an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004991939
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004999791
Do investment models fit firm-level data? - which model fits best? To answer this question we estimate alternative models using Compustat data. We find that both a version of the Hayashi (1982) and a model with decreasing returns to scale in production fit firm-level data very well. Our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005015292