Showing 1 - 10 of 196
The willingness-to-pay (WTP) and willingness-to-accept (WTA) disparity reported in a rich empirical literature suggests that people have only an imprecise idea of how valuable a good is to them. In this note, we provide axioms that formally relate this imprecision in the evaluation of a good to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008582130
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678366
In this paper we propose a novel interval optimization approach for portfolio selection when imprecise forecasts are available. We consider investors acting their choices according to the prospect theory, where scenarios are provided in the form of approximate numbers. The resulting constrained...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581925
This paper tests whether individual perceptions of markets as good or bad for a public good is correlated with the propensity to report gaps in willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) revealed within an incentive compatible mechanism. Identifying people based on a notion of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010930167
The experimental results of the current paper reveal positive relations between shortselling bidding prices and the WTA-WTP gap. This result may be explained by the status-quo bias.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008752466
This paper tests whether individual perceptions of markets as good or bad for a public good is correlated with the propensity to report gaps in willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) revealed within an incentive compatible mechanism. Identifying people based on a notion of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008833336
This paper tests whether individual perceptions of markets as good or bad for a public good is correlated with the propensity to report gaps in willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) revealed within an incentive compatible mechanism. Identifying people based on a notion of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010821516
Experimental and field evidence show that people perceive and evaluate new risks differently from risks that are common. In particular, people get used to the presence of certain risks and become less eager to avoid them. We explain this observation by including risks in the reference states of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263591
The paper introduces the concept of adjustment utility, that is, referencedependent utility from expectations. It offers an explanation for observed preferences that cannot be explained with existing models, and yields new predictions for individual decision making. The model gives a simple...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263858
This paper extends the standard principal-agent model with moral hazard to allow for agents having reference- dependent preferences according to Köszegi and Rabin (2006, 2007). The main finding is that loss aversion leads to fairly simple contracts. In particular, when shifting the focus from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264926