Showing 1 - 10 of 542
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011297143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011644979
The effect of health status on portfolio decisions has been extensively studied from an empirical viewpoint. In this paper, we propose a theoretical model of individuals' choice of financial assets under bivariate utility functions depending on wealth and health. Our model relies on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013001887
In this paper, we indicate that risk vulnerability can be associated with the concept of downside risk aversion (DRA) and an assumption about its behavior, namely that it is decreasing in wealth. Specifically, decreasing downside risk aversion in the Arrow-Pratt and Ross senses are respectively...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013059225
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012589941
Bivariate risk apportionment is the preference for dispersing risks associated with two aspects of individuals' well being into different states of the world. In this paper, we propose an intensity measure of this preference by extending to the bivariate case the concept of marginal rate of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014352311
The concept of absolute risk aversion proposed by K. Arrow (1965) and J. Pratt (1964) and the assumption that it is decreasing in wealth has played a central role in the analysis of risky choices. Ten years later S. Richard (1975) defined correlation aversion in the framework of bivariate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010678084
To analyze the impact of background risks, decreasing absolute risk aversion (DARA) must be combined with other restrictions on the shape of the utility function in order to make preferences risk vulnerable. In this note, we indicate that risk vulnerability can also be associated with the sole...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010700950
The relationship between willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce the probability of an adverse event and the degree of risk aversion is ambiguous. The ambiguity arises because paying for protection worsens the outcome in the event the adverse event occurs, which influences the expected marginal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010854430
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010926464