Showing 1 - 10 of 34
Care of stroke patients costs considerably more in specialized stroke units (SU) compared to care in general medical wards (GMW) but the technology may be cost effective if it leads to significantly improved outcomes. While randomized control trials show better outcomes for stroke patients...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528450
Care of stroke patients costs considerably more in specialized stroke units (SU) compared to care in general medical wards (GMW) but the technology may be cost effective if it leads to significantly improved outcomes. While randomized control trials show better outcomes for stroke patients...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014134748
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007250147
Care of stroke patients costs considerably more in specialized stroke units (SU) compared to care in general medical wards (GMW) but the technology may be cost effective if it leads to significantly improved outcomes. While randomized control trials show better outcomes for stroke patients...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010759615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003836342
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010197624
This paper provides econometric evidence linking a country's per capita government health expenditures and per capita income to two health outcomes: under-five mortality and maternal mortality. Using instrumental variables techniques (GMM-H2SL), we estimate the elasticity of these outcomes with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005694173
Do firms increase product lines to deter entry and, if so, when is such a strategy successful? We use data from UK pharmaceuticals to examine how incumbents respond to change in the threat of entry. In line with the entry deterrence motive, originators' product launch rate is higher when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012606226
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010722505
We develop a model of industry evolution in which firms choose proprietary standards (closed firm) or adopt a common standard (open firm). A closed entrant can capture multiple profits whereas an open entrant faces lower entry barriers: The odds of closed entry (relative to open entry) decrease...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005655418