Showing 1 - 10 of 196
We study optimal policy experimentation by a committee. We consider a dynamic bargaining game in which committee members choose either a risky reform or a safe alternative each period. When no redistribution is allowed the unique equilibrium outcome is generically inefficient. When...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012911102
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011916055
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011889807
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012655806
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009504760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008771293
When do voters win? In this paper we derive conditions under which a democracy will produce policies that favor the voter over special interests. We show that increasing political competition, increasing office holding benefits, decreasing potential rents to firms and increasing the salience of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014040229
Two heterogeneous agents contribute over time to a joint project, and collectively decide its scope. A larger scope requires greater cumulative effort and delivers higher benefits upon completion. We show that the efficient agent prefers a smaller scope, and preferences are time-inconsistent: as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012980151
What prevents majorities from extracting surplus from minorities in legislatures? We study an infinite horizon game where a legislative body votes to determine distributive policy each period. Proposals accepted by a simple majority are implemented, otherwise the status quo allocation prevails....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026561
Do mandatory spending programs such as Medicare improve efficiency? We analyze a model with two parties allocating a fixed budget to a public good and private transfers each period over an infinite horizon. We compare two institutions that differ in whether public good spending is discretionary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013089839