Showing 1 - 10 of 800
Embedding disasters into a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms induces strong nonlinearity in the pricing kernel, helping explain the empirical failure of the (consumption) CAPM. Our single-factor model reproduces the failure of the CAPM in explaining the value premium in finite...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012926281
Value stocks are more exposed to disaster risk than growth stocks. Embedding disasters into an investment-based asset pricing model induces strong nonlinearity in the pricing kernel. Our single-factor model reproduces the failure of the CAPM in explaining the value premium in finite samples in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013224982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010502721
Embedding disasters into a general equilibrium production economy with heterogeneous firms induces strong nonlinearity in the pricing kernel, helping explain the empirical failure of the (consumption) CAPM. Our single-factor model reproduces the failure of the CAPM in explaining the value...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010531874
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012861212
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480317
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129549
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012120359
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014475154
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013401736