Showing 1 - 10 of 185
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581159
This paper shows that accounting for variation in mistakes can be crucial for welfare analysis. Focusing on consumer underreaction to not-fully-salient sales taxes, we show theoretically that the efficiency costs of taxation are amplified by differences in underreaction across individuals and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012984747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012387188
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011960640
A growing body of evidence suggests that psychological biases can lead different implementations of otherwise equivalent tax incentives to result in meaningfully different behaviors. We argue that in the presence of such failures of “implementation invariance,” decoupling the question of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012944630
A growing body of evidence suggests that psychological biases can lead different implementations of otherwise equivalent tax incentives to result in meaningfully different behaviors. We argue that in the presence of such failures of "implementation invariance," decoupling the question of optimal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453733
This paper shows that accounting for variation in mistakes can be crucial for welfare analysis. Focusing on consumer underreaction to not-fully-salient sales taxes, we show theoretically that the efficiency costs of taxation are amplified by differences in underreaction across individuals and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456134
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011770369
What mental models do individuals use to approximate their tax schedule? Using incentivized forecasts of the U.S. Federal income tax schedule, we estimate the prevalence of the “schmeduling” heuristics for constructing mental representations of nonlinear incentive schemes. We find evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012978097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011539703