Showing 1 - 10 of 34,807
A common approach to comparing asset pricing models with traded factors involves a competition between models in pricing test-asset returns. We find that such practice, while seemingly reasonable, cannot be relied on to determine which is the superior model for several widely accepted criteria...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456972
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012094181
A Bayesian asset pricing test is derived that is easily computed in closed form from the standard F-statistic. Given a set of candidate traded factors, we develop a related test procedure that permits the computation of model probabilities for the collection of all possible pricing models that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970802
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011428008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011418311
We show how to conduct asymptotically valid tests of model comparison when the extent of model mispricing is gauged by the squared Sharpe ratio improvement measure. This is equivalent to ranking models on their maximum Sharpe ratios, effectively extending the GRS test to accommodate comparison...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011721670
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011749378
A common approach to comparing asset pricing models involves a competition in pricing test-asset returns. In contrast, we show that for models with traded factors, when the comparison is framed appropriately in terms of success in pricing both the test-asset and factor returns, the extent to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013004677
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012307548
A Bayesian asset-pricing test is derived that is easily computed in closed-form from the standard F-statistic. Given a set of candidate traded factors, we develop a related test procedure that permits an analysis of model comparison, i.e., the computation of model probabilities for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013010720