Showing 121 - 130 of 410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010171625
In this paper we show that, in the presence of buyer and seller power, a monopolist can enter into a costly contractual relationship with a low-quality supplier with the sole intention of improving its bargaining position relative to a high-quality supplier, without ever selling the good...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013086773
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010187695
In this paper we show that, in the presence of buyer and seller power, a monopolist can enter into a costly contractual relationship with a low-quality supplier with the sole intention of improving its bargaining position relative to a high-quality supplier, without ever selling the good...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011730400
Double marginalization causes inefficiencies in vertical markets. This paper argues that such inefficiencies may be beneficial to final consumers in markets producing vertically differentiated goods. The rationale behind this result is that enhancing efficiency in high-quality supply chains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011734182
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011346104
Contractual inefficiencies within supply chains increase an input price above its marginal cost, therefore they are considered detrimental to consumer surplus. We argue that such inefficiencies may be beneficial to consumers in quality-differentiated markets where the "finiteness property"...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015125382
We study the optimal contract choice of an upstream monopolist producing an essential input that may sell to two vertically differentiated downstream firms. The upstream supplier can offer an exclusive contract to one of the firms or non-exclusive contracts to both firms. Each of the latter can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011651970
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003298623