Showing 1 - 10 of 520
We investigate directly whether analyst behavior influenced the likelihood of banks winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,625 U.S. debt and equity offerings sold between December 1993 and June 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer's investment-banking relationships with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012717853
We investigate directly whether analyst behavior influenced the likelihood of banks winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,625 U.S. debt and equity offerings sold between December 1993 and June 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer s investment-banking relationships with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758170
We investigate directly whether analyst behavior influenced the likelihood of banks winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,625 U.S. debt and equity offerings sold between December 1993 and June 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer s investment-banking relationships with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758190
We investigate directly whether analyst behavior influenced the likelihood of banks winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,456 U.S. debt and equity offerings sold between December 1993 and June 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer s investment-banking relationships with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758191
We investigate why banks pressured research analysts to provide aggressive assessments of issuing firms during the 1990s. This competitive strategy did little to directly increase a bank's chances of winning lead-management mandates and ultimately led to regulatory penalties and costly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012717714
We investigate why banks pressured research analysts to provide aggressive assessments ofissuing firms during the 1990s. This competitive strategy did little to directly increase a bank s chances of winning lead-management mandates and ultimately led to regulatory penalties and costly structural...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758166
We investigate the empirical puzzle why banks pressured their analysts to provide aggressiveassessments of issuing firms during the 1990s when doing so apparently had little positive effect on their chances of receiving lead-management appointments and ultimately led to regulatory penalties and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758195
We show that relatively optimistic research and even the mere provision of research coverage for the issuer (regardless of its direction) attract co-management appointments for securities offerings. Co-management appointments are valuable because they help banks establish relationships with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013150822
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001764184
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001750589