Showing 11 - 20 of 95
The UK and the Netherlands have different legal and regulatory regimes for defined benefit pension schemes. This paper compares and contrasts the key features of those regimes. The UK allocates all of the underfunding risk in a UK defined benefit pension scheme to the employer, backed up by the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012921548
This article examines the current regulatory efforts aimed at creating a Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP). In doing so, it pursues two primary objectives: firstly, it seeks to explain the relevance of a European harmonized pension product to the overall concept of the single market;...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013306615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003915162
Both Collective Defined Contribution (CDC) and Collective Individual Defined Contribution (CIDC) schemes place any risks on pension scheme members instead of an external risk-bearer. In CDC schemes, assets are pooled collectively, allowing for risks to be shared between pension scheme members....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014116424
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014476960
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014364891
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011912059
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012161001
This article will concentrate on how the PEPPR presents an added value for both PEPP savers and providers. Therefore we explore the following: the legislative history of PEPPR, the reasons of PEPPR, the definition of a PEPP and its savers and providers. Furthermore attention will be drawn to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012847455