Showing 1 - 10 of 212
[...]We also concentrate our survey on literature that testseconomic hypotheses within samples of U.S. firms. However,we believe that much of our discussion can be generalized tofirms throughout the world. Bushman and Smith (2003)present a broad overview of how differences in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005869804
This article addresses four major concerns about the pay of U.S. CEOs: (1) failure to pay for performance; (2) excessive levels of pay; (3) failure to index options and other equity-based pay, resulting in windfalls; and (4) too much unwinding of incentives. The authors' main message is that most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005523373
In a recent and influential empirical paper, Francis, LaFond, Olsson, and Schipper (FLOS) [2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39, 295-327] conclude that accruals quality (AQ) is a priced risk factor. We explain that FLOS' regressions examining a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492901
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005376819
Although recent research documents a positive relation between corporate transparency and the proportion of independent directors, the direction of causality is unclear. We examine a regulatory shock that substantially increased board independence for some firms, and find that information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010906191
We compute and compare risk-adjusted CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom, where the risk adjustment is based on estimated risk premiums stemming from the equity incentives borne by CEOs. Controlling for firm and industry characteristics, we find that U.S. CEOs have higher pay, but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010534995
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006512410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006543063